Cases 11 - 20 of 105
Rucker v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Douglas Rucker
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Michael Snyder, Will Mortensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Hall et al
as 4:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Eugene James Turner
Defendant:
Amy Hall, Wendell Franklin and City of Tulsa, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson et al v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Patricia Anderson
Defendant:
K Williams, A Perez and City of Tulsa, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montero v. Tulsa Airport Improvements Trust, et al
as 23-5039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK R. MONTERO
Defendant / Appellee:
TULSA AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS TRUST, AKA T.A.I.T., CITY OF TULSA and JUDGE TAMMY BRUCE
Montero v. Tulsa Airport Improvement Trust et al
as 4:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Frank R Montero
Defendant:
Tulsa Airport Improvement Trust, City of Tulsa, Tammy Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hankins v. Ehrenrich et al
as 4:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hankins, Jr
Defendant:
Darin Ehrenrich and City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gatling v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Altaneisha Gatling
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Christopher R Beyerl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burke v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 22-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE D. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, G.T. BYNUM, Mayor of City of Tulsa, MARK SWINNEY, City of Tulsa Attorney and others
Brooks v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Easker James Brooks, III
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma and Cherish Comfort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sayles v. City of Tulsa
as 4:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D Sayles and Lawrence Sayles
Defendant:
City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
