Other Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 50
EDGE v. HAWKINS et al
as 1:2020cv02668
Defendant: JAMES BELL, MIKE HART, RYAN MEARS and others
Plaintiff: VINSON L. EDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodhouse v. Leazenby et al
as 4:2020cv00071
Plaintiff: Brandon L. Woodhouse
Defendant: Lori Sustarsic, Sheriff Tobe H. Leazenby, John Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. GRANT et al
as 2:2020cv00389
Defendant: CODY TIDD, GRANT, TRAVIS CLEMENTS and others
Plaintiff: BARNARD L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock et al v. Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00267
Defendant: John Davis
Plaintiff: Grant Matlock and Stephanie Matlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v Shiparski et al
as 3:2020cv00298
Defendant: CITY OF MICHIGAN CITY, MICHAEL McLEMORE, ADAM BRINKMAN and others
Plaintiff: DEANDRE GRANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McKinney v. Grant County Sheriff We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00151
Defendant: Grant County Sheriff
Plaintiff: MICHAEL P MCKINNEY
Not Classified By Court: Anthony Stites
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Frost v. Quality Correctional Care LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00084
Plaintiff: JEFFREY FROST
Defendant: VICKI WIREMAN, TIPPECANOE COUNTY, ADAM GRANT WAGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matlock v. Fredricks et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Defendant: Benjamin Fredricks and John O Leggett
Plaintiff: Grant Matlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock v. Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00035
Defendant: Shannon Paige Davis
Plaintiff: Grant Matlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00123
Defendant: ROBERT BILLINGHAM, GRANT VOGTMAN, LIBBY SPOTTS and others
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?