Other Civil Rights Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
HAWKINS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv01486
Plaintiff: HAMOND HAWKINS
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CHARLES H. RAMSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAEZ v. MECCA et al
as 2:2012cv00417
Plaintiff: RINALDO BAEZ
Defendant: JOSEPH MECCA, "COUNSELOR EARL, "MERCER COUNSELOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAWKINS et al v. LLOYD et al
as 2:2010cv04284
Plaintiff: ROBERT D. HAWKINS, ASHLYN V. SAUNDERS, III and DANIELLE WADE
Defendant: ROXANNE LLOYD and BRIAN LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASTRO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv05082
Plaintiff: MARIBEL CASTRO
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DEREK HAWKINS and POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE(S)
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BOGGI v. MEDICAL REVIEW AND ACCREDITING COUNCIL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv04941
Plaintiff: JOSPEH O. BOGGI
Defendant: MEDICAL REVIEW AND ACCREDITING COUNCIL, LARRY DOWNS, JOE SOKOLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
COLON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv04599
Plaintiff: MARIA COLON
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, TYSHAN WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
RIVERA v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv01614
Plaintiff: JASON RIVERA
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA POLICE STG. DEREK HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HAWKINS v. SEPTA
as 2:2007cv02834
Plaintiff: TERRENCE HAWKINS
Defendant: SEPTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WASHINGTON, et al. v. C.O.T. MORGAN, et al
as 2:2007cv00976
Plaintiff: TERRANCE WASHINGTON
Defendant: C.O.T. MORGAN, C.O.T. MORGAN, T.S. THARP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?