Cases 11 - 20 of 45
ALLEN v. JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-99
as 2:2018cv02709
Plaintiff:
KYLE ISHMAEL HASSAN ALLEN
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-99
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. John and Jane Does 1-99
as 1:2017cv02193
Plaintiff:
Eric Jon Phelps
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-99
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CINTRON-GARCIA v. SANTIAGO-DEJESUS et al
as 5:2018cv00456
Plaintiff:
MARCELINA CINTRON-GARCIA
Defendant:
JESUS SANTIAGO-DEJESUS, DANIEL T. WHITE, C. MORAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALABRESE v. CALABRESE et al
as 2:2017cv04231
Plaintiff:
TARA CALABRESE
Defendant:
ROBERT CALABRESE, MARLA S. LAYNAS , NADINE COLGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISMAKOVIC et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00736
Plaintiff:
SUADA ISMAKOVIC and ARMIN ISMAKOVIC
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , LAKESHIA THOMAS , TEMPLE UNIVERSITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THOMPSON v. HENS-GRECO et al
as 2:2016cv01100
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
KATHRYN M. HENS-GRECO, KIMBERLY BERKELEY CLARK, KRISTA ABRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Mooney et al
as 4:2016cv00557
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney, Tom McGinley, Tony Luscavage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BRAME v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
CHESTER BRAME
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAZ v. RUCKER et al
as 2:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
CLARISSA DIAZ
Defendant:
COMER RUCKER, SCOTT PAUL , MICHAEL WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS et al v. AMERICHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 2:2015cv02650
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ROSS and SANDRA D. DIXON-ROSS
Defendant:
AMERICHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, DETHLEFS-PYKOSH SHOOK & MURPHY LAW GROUP, LLC , JONATHAN KONTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
