Cases 11 - 19 of 19
SHOATZ v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2016cv03021
Plaintiff:
MAURICE SHOATZ
Defendant:
MICHELLE FARRELL, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10, CYNTHIA LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv02798
Plaintiff:
DARRYL JONES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, TOM MCGINELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINK v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2015cv00819
Plaintiff:
BRANDON PATRICK LINK
Defendant:
TODD A. ADAMSKI , LIBERTY TRANSPORTATION, INC. , JOSEPH HUTH and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
SCHUTT et al v. MELMARK, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02731
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER SCHUTT , CLARENCE SCHUTT and BARBARA SCHUTT
Defendant:
MELMARK, INC., JOANNE GILLIS-DONOVAN, GEORGE P. LINKE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donahue v. Stolfa et al
as 3:2013cv01276
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Donahue
Defendant:
Elaine Stolfa, Other Luzerne County & PA Career Link and Workforce Investment Staff, Angelo Salvatore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donahue v. Hazleton Career Link et al
as 3:2013cv01285
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Donahue
Defendant:
Hazleton Career Link, PA Department of Labor and Industry and Luzerne County Workforce Investment Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BENNETT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv01025
Plaintiff:
CRAIG TROY BENNETT
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VURIMINDI v. FUQUA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
as 2:2010cv00234
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR R. VURIMINDI
Defendant:
FUQUA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, MOIRA RINGO, DOUGLAS M. BASHAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
JOHNSON et al v. GLOBAL TEL*LINK
as 2:2008cv06056
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY R. JOHNSON and HIXCY COTHRAN
Defendant:
GLOBAL TEL*LINK
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
