Cases 11 - 20 of 175
Shackleford v. DeJoy et al
as 3:2023cv01400
Plaintiff:
Dave D. Shackleford
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, United States Postal Service, Gary Barksdale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Connecticut v. Antar
as 3:2023cv01178
Plaintiff:
State of Connecticut
Defendant:
Theodora F. Antar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Griffin Health Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Solange Martinez
Defendant:
Griffin Health Corporation, Waterbury Hospital, Griffin Family Physicians and others
Traylor v. Town of Waterford et al
as 3:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Traylor
Defendant:
Town of Waterford, PHH Mortgage Corporation, State of Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oyarzun v. Griffin Health Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Luisa Oyarzun
Defendant:
Griffin Health Corporation, Waterbury Hospital, Griffin Family Physicians and others
Furst v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Joel Furst
Defendant:
State of Connecticut and US Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 3:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Emily Doe
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, Joette Katz and State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dupreme v. State of Connecticut
as 3:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Kasaun Dupreme
Defendant:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bernardini v. State of Connecticut, et al
as 3:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Chris Joseph Bernardini, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Connecticut and Michael Denison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
