Cases 21 - 30 of 105
Morris v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2019cv00073
Defendant:
Kurt Dodd, Joshua E Dupler, Anthony First and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Talbot Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2019cv00069
Defendant:
Angela Emberton, E Rangel, Will Mortenson and others
Plaintiff:
Ira Lee Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheffield v. Taylor et al
as 6:2018cv00408
Defendant:
Gore, Town of and Randy E. Taylor
Plaintiff:
John Charles Sheffield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
R et al v. Fallin et al
as 5:2018cv01137
Defendant:
Ed Lake, Myron Pope, Aneta F Wilkinson and others
Plaintiff:
Naiesha Nicole Cray, A C, N C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ciempa v. Del City City of et al
as 5:2018cv00955
Defendant:
Ken Bartlett, Pam Finch, Del City City of and others
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Ciempa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods et al v. Grant & Weber Inc
as 5:2018cv00939
Defendant:
Grant & Weber Inc
Plaintiff:
Ronald E Woods and Karrie Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norrid et al v. Troxel et al
as 6:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
Shane Norrid , Kermit Michael Troxel , Kevin Hartman and others
Defendant:
D.A.R.P., Inc., , Raymond Jones , Hendren Plastics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595
Sparks v. McClain County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2017cv01174
Defendant:
McClain County Board of County Commissioners, Joshua Shaw and Don Hewett
Plaintiff:
Todd E Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Owens v. Child Support Office of Fort Smith Arkansas et al
as 4:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Owens, Sr
Defendant:
Child Support Office of Fort Smith Arkansas and Anita Elaine Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. All State Insurance et al
as 4:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Owens
Defendant:
All State Insurance and Mike Auto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
