Cases 21 - 30 of 117
Callender v. Department of the Prosecuting Attorney for the County of Maui
as 1:2020cv00321
Defendant:
Department of the Prosecuting Attorney for the County of Maui, John Kalama, Doe Defendants 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Tamira Callender, Trey R. Callender and Tamira L. Callender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomes et al v. County of Kauai et al
as 1:2020cv00189
Plaintiff:
Lance Kamuela Gomes, Brandee Leigh Abuan, I.A.G. and others
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Robin Serquina, Wallace G. Rezentes Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oyadomari v. Choy et al
as 1:2019cv00656
Defendant:
Sutherland Choy and Honolulu Police
Plaintiff:
William K. Oyadomari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ah Puck, Jr. v. Lahaina Police Department
as 1:2019cv00636
Defendant:
The United States Court of Federal Claims and Lahaina Police Department
Plaintiff:
Hardy K. Ah Puck, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohm v. City and County of Honolulu
as 1:2019cv00541
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu, P M Autoworks Inc., Jane/John Does 1-29 and others
Plaintiff:
Jianna Bohm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kam v. Helm, et al
as 1:2019cv00052
Defendant:
State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Conservation and Resource Enforcement, Carlton Helm, Doe Defendants 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Wyatt J. K. Kam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larkin v. Kenison
as 1:2018cv00360
Defendant:
Hawaii Police Department, The, County of Hawaii, The, Paul K. Ferreira and others
Plaintiff:
Rosalinda Larkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yoshikawa v. City and County of Honolulu
as 1:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
Hitoshi Yoshikawa
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu and Troy K. Seguirant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoapili v. Enoki et al
as 1:2017cv00384
Petitioner:
Dianne K. Hoapili
Respondent:
Elliot R. Enoki and Steven T. Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
