Cases 21 - 30 of 7,806
Williams v. United States Government
as 3:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Travis B Williams
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
John Doe (RLM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RLM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reguli v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Connie Reguli
Defendant:
Joseph A. Woodruff, Estate of Kimberly Helper, John Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Republican Party of Cumberland County TN
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Republican Party of Cumberland County TN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinkle v. Kingsport, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Daniel G. Hinkle
Defendant:
Kingsport, Tennessee, Sullivan County, Tennessee, Robert Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Filauro v. Rausch
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Richard Danial Filauro
Defendant:
David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. 1011778 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company et al
as 3:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
1011778 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company, 1019334 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company, Burger King Canada Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ewin et al v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Tywaska Ewin and L.E., a minor
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
American Marriage Ministries v. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
American Marriage Ministries
Defendant:
Cheryl Collins, Jennings Jones, Coty Wamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Kerley
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Clark
Defendant:
Jonathan Kerley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
