Cases 31 - 40 of 287
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Charles E Jones
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maxwell v. CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT) et al
as 2:2022cv02033
Plaintiff:
Kyle Maxwell
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT), Shannon Bowen, Alvin Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Jones v. Crenshaw
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jones
Defendant:
Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr. and Aleta A. Trauger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Fiscus v. Piercey et al
as 3:2021cv00686
Plaintiff:
Michelle Fiscus
Defendant:
Lisa Piercey and Tim Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Bridgeforth et al
as 2:2021cv02505
Plaintiff:
Tamera E. Ingram
Defendant:
Dedra Bridgeforth, Eddie Jones, Carolyn Addison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thigpen v. Davies et al
as 3:2021cv00581
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alan Thigpen
Defendant:
Robert E. Lee Davies, William Acree, Don Ash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Caperton et al
as 1:2021cv00047
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Jones
Defendant:
Eric Caperton, Zach Ferguson and Lawrence County, TN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Shelby County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2021cv02135
Defendant:
Government Hospitals in Tennessee, Shelby County Mob Government and Shelby County Sheriff Dept.
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxey v. Kirkland And Ellis, LLP et al
as 2:2021cv00043
Defendant:
Angelique Ashby, Hillary R. Clinton, Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
James C Maxey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
