Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Wells v. Graham
as 3:2013cv01809
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Wells
Defendant:
Rachel Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kost v. Graham et al
as 6:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
Carl Kost
Defendant:
Paul Graham , Wayne Camp , Jerry Duggan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Graham v. Tygrett
as 3:2012cv05037
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lauren Graham
Defendant:
Howard Tygrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. City of Temple, TX et al
as 6:2012cv00309
Defendant:
City of Temple, TX, Trudi Dill, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. Akaka et al
as 2:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Defendant:
Daniel Akaka, Lamar Alexander, Kelly Ayotte and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Watkins et al v. Cornell Companies, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00260
Plaintiff:
Theresa Watkins , Brittany O Davis , LeeAnn N Maestas and others
Defendant:
Cornell Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham et al v. City of Humble et al
as 4:2010cv00432
Plaintiff:
James T Graham and Glendy B Graham
Defendant:
City of Humble , Donald McMannes , Darrell Boeske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanner v. Smith et al Do not docket in (4:08mc580). Documents should be filed in (4:09cv3941)
as 4:2009cv03941
Plaintiff:
Cas Tanner
Defendant:
Peggy Smith, Rudy Soliz, Kenneth Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Graham v. City of Justin Municipality et al
as 4:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Graham
Defendant:
City of Justin Municipality, Mike Evans, Virginia Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Howard v. Bairfield et al
as 6:2008cv00057
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Howard
Defendant:
Clyde D. Bairfield, Jr., Scott L Holley, Billy J Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
