Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Robison v. Doe et al
as 4:2012cv02205
Plaintiff:
Heather M. Robison
Defendant:
John Doe and St. Charles County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gifford v. Poplar Bluff R-1 School District
as 1:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Heather Nicole Gifford
Defendant:
Poplar Bluff R-1 School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Phipps v. Bialczak et al
as 4:2012cv00554
Plaintiff:
Lataya Phipps
Defendant:
William A. Bialczak , Kenneth J. Bialczak , S & H Parking System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Clark v. Den-Tex Central, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv01061
Defendant:
Den-Tex Central, Inc. and Heather R Hankins
Plaintiff:
Antonio Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kipper v. Den-Tex Central, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv01060
Defendant:
Den-Tex Central, Inc. and Heather R Hankins
Plaintiff:
Kumari Kipper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kipper v. Den-Tex Central, Inc.et al
as 4:2011cv01059
Defendant:
Den-Tex Central, Inc. and Heather R Hankins
Plaintiff:
Katina Kipper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gober v. Conley et al
as 2:2011cv04092
Plaintiff:
James Christopher Gober
Defendant:
Frank Conley, Kieth Bail, Chassidy Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swann v. Calahan et al
as 4:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Heather Swann
Defendant:
Terry Calahan , Aaron Burkemper and City of New Melle, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McKaig et al v. Taney County Commissioner et al
as 6:2011cv04014
Plaintiff:
Larry McKaig and Heather McKaig
Defendant:
Taney County Commissioner , Taney County Planning Commission , Taney County Board of Adjustment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jefferson v. Kennett, City Of et al
as 1:2010cv00153
Plaintiff:
Heather Jefferson
Defendant:
Kennett, City Of, Albert W. Fisher, Joe Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
