Cases 31 - 40 of 319
VASKO v. REINHART et al
as 2:2021cv01708
Plaintiff:
JOHN VASKO
Defendant:
MICHAEL K. REINHART, ANTHONY A. BAUM, JR., JOHN D. CORNA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steinberg v. PA State Board of Pharmacy et al
as 1:2021cv01652
Plaintiff:
Norman Steinberg
Defendant:
PA State Board of Pharmacy, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, K. Kalonji Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Turner et al
as 1:2021cv01421
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S. Saunders
Defendant:
Alphonso Turner, John W. Lester Williams, Carl Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. JUNE et al
as 2:2021cv03683
Plaintiff:
DARRON THOMAS
Defendant:
CHAD JUNE, ASHLEY BANKS, DANIELLE M. OUTLAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K. et al v. DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2021cv03212
Plaintiff:
GAVIN K. and ANDREW K. AND ALLYSON K.
Defendant:
DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KREIDER et al v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 2:2021cv02693
Plaintiff:
LORI KREIDER and A. K.
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE, POLICE CHIEF JARRAD BERKIHISER and CITY OF LANCASTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KREIDER et al v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2021cv02693
Plaintiff:
LORI KREIDER and A. K.
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE, POLICE CHIEF JARRAD BERKIHISER and CITY OF LANCASTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. City of Lancaster et al
as 2:2021cv02706
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER and THE MANHIEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM K. LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. City of Lancaster et al
as 1:2021cv00985
Defendant:
City of Lancaster and The Manhiem Police Department
Plaintiff:
William K. Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKENS v. CIRCLE K
as 2:2021cv00643
Defendant:
CIRCLE K
Plaintiff:
LASHAWNNA AIKENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
