Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Kelly v. Day et al
as 1:2016cv10560
Plaintiff:
Danny M. Kelly
Defendant:
Richard J. Day and Town of Chelmsford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelly v. Town of Chelmsford
as 1:2015cv14219
Plaintiff:
Danny M. Kelly
Defendant:
Town of Chelmsford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kasparian v. City of Waltham et al
as 1:2015cv13671
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Kasparian, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Waltham, Timothy Kelly, Thomas MacInnis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andro v. Town of Brookline et al
as 1:2015cv13030
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Andro
Defendant:
Town of Brookline, Daniel C. O'Leary, Michael John McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mackey v. Piccolo et al
as 1:2015cv12173
Plaintiff:
James Mackey
Defendant:
Albert Piccolo, Michael Donovan, Timothy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Properties, LLC et al v. Worcester et al
as 4:2015cv40009
Plaintiff:
College Hill Properties, LLC , Caro Street Properties, LLC , Clay Street Properties, LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Worcester , Department of Building and Zoning , Department of Health and Housing Inspections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Silvestri v. Smith et al
as 1:2014cv13137
Plaintiff:
Mark Silvestri
Defendant:
James Smith, Patrick Kelly, George Kelsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hickson v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2014cv40069
Plaintiff:
John Hickson
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Michael V. O'Brien, Gary J. Gemme and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bochart v. City of Lowell et al
as 1:2013cv11753
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Bochart
Defendant:
City of Lowell , Eric G Wayne and Hookslide Kelly's, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cayo v. Fitzpatrick et al
as 3:2013cv30113
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cayo
Defendant:
Darrin J Fitzpatrick, James Kelly, David Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
