Cases 31 - 39 of 39
TOPLISEK v. CANON MCMILLAN SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2010cv00767
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY TOPLISEK
Defendant:
CANON MCMILLAN SCHOOL DISTRICT, NICK BAYAT, LINDA NICHOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv01336
Plaintiff:
LANCE NICHOLS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roach et al v. Marrow et al
as 3:2008cv01136
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Roach, Deneen Roach, Matthew Roach and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Marrow, John Adams, Jr., Cathy A. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NICHOLS v. CITY OF WILMINGTON et al
as 2:2008cv02782
Plaintiff:
DAMEN NICHOLS
Defendant:
CITY OF WILMINGTON and PUBLIC WORK
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MAIER et al v. CANON MCMILLAN SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2008cv00154
Plaintiff:
LORI MAIER and JAMES MAIER
Defendant:
CANON MCMILLAN SCHOOL DISTRICT, LINDA NICHOLS, MICHELE MOELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bodnar et al v. Wagner et al
as 3:2007cv02038
Plaintiff:
Allen S. Bodnar and Tiffany Bodnar
Defendant:
Kevin Wagner and Scott Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nichols v. The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania
as 1:2007cv01943
Plaintiff:
Tammy Rae Nichols
Defendant:
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gardner et al v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2007cv01947
Plaintiff:
Dawn Gardner and Rebecca Jane Thompson
Defendant:
Luzerne County, Luzerne County District Attorney's Office, David W. Lupas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilligbauer v. Nichols et al
as 4:2007cv00797
Plaintiff:
Robert Gilligbauer
Defendant:
Richard R. Nichols and City of Shamokin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
