Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Yisroel et al
as 4:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
Terence Robinson
Defendant:
Billie Yisroel, Rosemary Caston, Norma G Washam and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Landwehr et al v. Missouri State Of et al
as 4:2008cv00457
Plaintiff:
Raymond L Landwehr and Mary Jane Landwehr
Defendant:
Missouri State Of, Division of Family Services, Jay Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
L.L. Nelson Enterprises, Inc. et al v. St. Louis County, et al.
as 4:2008cv00762
Plaintiff:
L.L. Nelson Enterprises, Inc. and Laura L. Nelson-Smith
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Curley Hines, Marcus Lipe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Duvall v. Maxey et al
as 2:2007cv00047
Plaintiff:
John C. Duvall
Defendant:
James Ray Maxey, Helen V. Lawrence and Dimple Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Duvall v. Maxey et al
as 4:2007cv01846
Plaintiff:
John C. Duvall
Defendant:
James Ray Maxey, Helen V. Lawrence and Dimple Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Armour v. St. Louis County Work et al
as 4:2007cv01553
Plaintiff:
Bobby J. Armour
Defendant:
St. Louis County Work, Garry Earl, John Thro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. St. Louis, City of et al
as 4:2007cv01552
Plaintiff:
DeOndre Robinson
Defendant:
St. Louis, City of, Chris Goodson, Francis Slay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Jackson County et al
as 4:2007cv00151
Plaintiff:
Terence Robinson and Terence Robinson
Defendant:
Jackson County, Missouri, Truman Medical Center, Truman Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.