Cases 41 - 50 of 339
Grissom v. Merkle et al
as 2:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Mark Grissom
Defendant:
John Merkle, Nathan Whitaker, Tony Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peden et al v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Terry Henderson Peden and The Law Group of THP, PLLC.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Diver v. Shelby County Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
William K Diver
Defendant:
Shelby County Alabama, John Samaniego, Mark Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Doe
as 1:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Mikal Shanton Watson
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKee v. Dunn et al
as 2:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Denice McKee
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, John Q. Hamm, Patricia Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Hamm et al
as 2:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
Fred Turner
Defendant:
John Hamm, Patricia Jones and David Lamar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pettway v. Pettway et al
as 1:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Pettway
Defendant:
Jamal Pettway, Tabitha Lamar, Rodrick Sheldton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bandy-Freeman v. City of Tarrant, Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv01148
Plaintiff:
Veronica Bandy-Freeman
Defendant:
City of Tarrant, Alabama, Wayman A Newton and John Tommy Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullen v. Butler et al
as 1:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Willie A Sullen
Defendant:
Charles R. Butler, David Barnett, Chris Galanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Angela Wells
Defendant:
Thomas Jones, Jennifer McCovery, Danarris Lovejoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
