Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Ryan v. Armstrong et al
as 0:2014cv01776
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ryan, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Armstrong, Patrick Culloton, Craig Stowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Castilleja et al
as 0:2014cv01700
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Adam Castilleja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roschen et al v. Wabasha County et al
as 0:2013cv02490
Plaintiff:
Debra Roschen , James Roschen , Megan Roschen and others
Defendant:
Wabasha County , Anoka County , Anoka County Community Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Anderson et al
as 0:2013cv01776
Plaintiff:
Frankie Edward Adams
Defendant:
Steve Anderson , Soren Mahowald , John Pyka and others
King, et al v. City of Minneapolis, et al
as 0:2013cv01431
Plaintiff:
Zachary Z. King , Craig E. Dyar, Jr. and Anthony L. Wilson
Defendant:
Minneapolis, City of , Heather Sterzinger , Yolanda Wilks and others
Keefe v. Adams et al
as 0:2013cv00326
Plaintiff:
Craig Keefe
Defendant:
Beth Adams , Connie Frisch , Kelly McCalla and others
Bounds et al v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2013cv00266
Plaintiff:
Michael Bounds , Forest Olivier , Wia Day and others
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Minnesota State Patrol, Riccardo Munoz and others
Parker v. Chard et al
as 0:2012cv02574
Plaintiff:
Alexys Sherry Parker
Defendant:
Adam Chard , Robert Illetschko and Minneapolis, City of
Nazario et al v. Chedister et al
as 0:2012cv00066
Plaintiff:
Michael David Nazario , Sr., Yasiah Olivia Mahaliya Nazario, Michael David Nazario, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Karin Chedister, Dave Adney, Pete Dymit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vilenchik et al v. Crystal, City of et al
as 0:2011cv02711
Plaintiff:
Andrew Vilenchik , Community Finance Group, Inc. , Priority Title, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Crystal, City of , John Banick , David Oyaas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
