Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Nails v. Foley
as 2:2009cv00782
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Mike Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nails v. Centurytel Phone Company (MAG+)
as 2:2008cv00289
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Centurytel Phone Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nails v. Enterprise Ozark Community College et al (MAG+)
as 2:2008cv00290
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Enterprise Ozark Community College, Judy Miller, Karen Chapin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nails v. Dothan Security Inc.
as 1:2008cv00291
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Dothan Security Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nails v. Housing and Urban Development (MAG+)
as 2:2008cv00265
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nails v. Gilmore
as 7:2007cv02077
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Charles Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nails v. Houston County Circuit Clerk Office
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2007cv00959
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Houston County Circuit Clerk Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nails v. Blakney
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2007cv00941
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Jan Blakney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nails v. Enterprise Ozark Community College (MAG+)
as 1:2007cv00939
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Enterprise Ozark Community College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nails v. Spann et al
as 1:2007cv00940
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
John Spann, Mary Murphy and Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.