Cases 41 - 50 of 287
THOMAS v. JUNE et al
as 2:2021cv03683
Plaintiff:
DARRON THOMAS
Defendant:
CHAD JUNE, ASHLEY BANKS, DANIELLE M. OUTLAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIROLLI v. TD BANK VISA et al
as 2:2021cv03054
Plaintiff:
LUCY GARETH ROCHA PIROLLI
Defendant:
TD BANK VISA, WELLS FARGO VISA, PETER MANUEL PIROLLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. VORTEQ COIL FINISHERS, LLC
as 5:2021cv02557
Defendant:
VORTEQ COIL FINISHERS, LLC
Plaintiff:
VICTOR BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
KEEL III v. PHILADELPHIA PA 19106 POLICE DEPARTMENTS et al
as 2:2021cv01845
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEE KEEL III
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PA 19106 POLICE DEPARTMENTS, PHILADELPHIA'S HOUSING AUTHORITY, MELANIE ANDRA ORUSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEL III v. SEPTA'S PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITYS C.L.S. et al
as 2:2021cv01843
Defendant:
TD BANK, C.B.H.I.C.M.S., PHILADELPHIA'S ARRESTING POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEE KEEL III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. THE MUNICIPALITY OF PENN HILLS et al
as 2:2021cv00140
Defendant:
BRADLEY HOOVER, DENNIS PAPE, MUNICIPALITY OF PENN HILLS and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL D. BANKS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONDARUK v. PNC BANK
as 2:2020cv05979
Defendant:
PNC BANK
Plaintiff:
VICTOR BONDARUK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PENNSYLVANA et al
as 2:2020cv03498
Defendant:
TRAFFIC COURT and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PENNSYLVANA
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2020cv00856
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, RICHARD PADUDO, CHIEF, PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Pittsburg Police Department et al
as 4:2020cv00932
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Pittsburg Police Department, City of Pittsburg, Chief, Pittsburg Bureau of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
