Cases 41 - 50 of 121
I.Z. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv01517
Plaintiff:
I.Z.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LORD v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
LYNDA LORD
Defendant:
TREVON W. COLEMAN, NANCY GIROUX, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ANTHONY MOORE
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, BOROUGH OF EPHRATA, PETER G. SHEPPARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yun v. Bank of America et al
as 3:2016cv02416
Plaintiff:
Gloria Sun Jung Yun
Defendant:
Bank of America, Brian Moynihan, Kristine Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MICHAEL et al v. CONCERN - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES et al
as 5:2016cv05689
Plaintiff:
HARLEY MICHAEL and EMILY BILLHEIM
Defendant:
CONCERN - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES, COUNTY OF BERKS , REBECCA KELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv03095
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTA J. MOORE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, GERARD BRENNAN and MELVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA FONTANEZ v. SMITH et al
as 5:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
EDGARDO GARCIA FONTANEZ
Defendant:
JORDAN SMITH and BRIAN MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LERRO v. MORREL et al
as 2:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND LERRO
Defendant:
ROBERT MORREL, HOLLY MORREL, TONY BELEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. CAPLAN et al
as 2:2015cv06853
Plaintiff:
AARON MOORE
Defendant:
JOSEPH CAPLAN and ERIC P. RUCH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 1:2015cv02392
Plaintiff:
George Moore
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PA, Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General, Kathleen Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
