Cases 51 - 60 of 127
IRVIN v. SHARIEF et al
as 1:2017cv01128
Defendant:
BARBARA SHARIEF, CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, RICK SCOTT and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW IRVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fries v. Scott et al
as 3:2017cv00234
Plaintiff:
Richard G. Fries, Jr.
Defendant:
Rick Scott, John Ondrejicka, H. Shah S. Sanhu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moorish Science Temple of America et al v. State of Florida et al
as 6:2017cv00269
Plaintiff:
Moorish Science Temple of America and Moorish Law Services
Defendant:
State of Florida, Rick Scott, Jeffrey L. Ashton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. State of Florida et al
as 0:2017cv60204
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
State of Florida, Tim Shepherd, Pam Bondi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY et al
as 4:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
HENRY BROWN
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY, TIFFINY JONES, KLINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. SCOTT
as 4:2016cv00715
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEWIS
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beisel et al v. Pierson et al
as 8:2016cv03065
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Beisel, IV
Defendant:
R.E. Pierson, Special Agent Scroggs, Special Agent Riggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cotterill et al
as 1:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Smith
Defendant:
Dan Cotterill, Rick Scott, Lisbon, IA, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Gillespie
as 0:2016cv61235
Plaintiff:
Andramedia C. Robinson
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Gillespie, Vicky Plant, Nicolas Lopane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez et al v. Scott et al
as 1:2016cv20603
Plaintiff:
Alfred Hernandez, Anchor Shipping Co., Arthur L Morgan and others
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Kelly L. Church, Pam Bondi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
