Cases 51 - 60 of 396
Grimes v. State of Ohio et al
as 3:2021cv02275
Plaintiff:
Eric Anthony Grimes
Defendant:
State of Ohio and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Folmar v. State of Ohio Human Resources Department et al
as 4:2021cv02233
Plaintiff:
Ian L. Folmar, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Ohio Human Resources Department, Trumbull County Child Support Enforcement Agency and Stark County Child Support Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Folmar v. State of Ohio Human Resource Dept. et al
as 2:2021cv05427
Plaintiff:
Ian L Folmar
Defendant:
State of Ohio Human Resource Dept., Commissioners Office City of Columbus, Franklin County, Judge Ted Barrows and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. State of Ohio et al
as 3:2021cv02163
Plaintiff:
Eric Anthony Grimes
Defendant:
State of Ohio and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford-Kimbrough v. State of Ohio et al
as 3:2021cv02161
Plaintiff:
Lois Ford-Kimbrough
Defendant:
State of Ohio and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Ohio Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2021cv01947
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Wolfe, III
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Major Tim McConahay, Corrections Officers John Jane Doe 1-25 and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nalls v. State of Ohio et al
as 3:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
Larry Nalls
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Michael Brush, Anthony A Ahboud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dugas v. City of Moraine Ohio et al
as 3:2021cv00231
Plaintiff:
Greg Dugas
Defendant:
City of Moraine Ohio, Moraine Police Department, Walmart Stores East, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Ohio, et al v. Milasinovic, et al
as 1:2021cv01593
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio and Erin Smith
Defendant:
Milan Milasinovic, Madgelaine Deeby, Village of Bratenahl, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
