Cases 61 - 70 of 124
Persaud v. Lee et al
as 1:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
Christopher Persaud
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee, James O. Payne, Sarah Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Conmed, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00507
Plaintiff:
Cyle J. Moore
Defendant:
Conmed, Inc. , Conmed, LLC , Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polidi v. Cheshire Parker Schneider & Bryan, PLLC et al
as 1:2016cv01534
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
Cheshire Parker Schneider & Bryan, PLLC, Alan Schneider and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bata v. Hains et al
as 1:2016cv00573
Plaintiff:
Mia Bata
Defendant:
Sheriff's Deputy Hains and Sheriff's Deputies Jane Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latson v. Clarke et al
as 1:2016cv00447
Plaintiff:
Reginald Cornelius Latson
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Marion Correctional Treatment Center, Dara Robichaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pair v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2015cv00776
Plaintiff:
Larry Pair
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minetree v. Bogley et al
as 1:2015cv01694
Plaintiff:
Sally Minetree
Defendant:
Hilleary Bogley, Lane Phillippe, Mary Tarr and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Day v. City of Fredericksburg, Virginia et al
as 1:2015cv01477
Plaintiff:
Lantz Day
Defendant:
City of Fredericksburg, Virginia, Joseph Young, James Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfaro-Garcia v. Henrico County et al
as 3:2015cv00349
Plaintiff:
Jaime S. Alfaro-Garcia
Defendant:
Henrico County, Michael L. Wade and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giddens-Thomas v. City of Richmond, Virginia et al
as 3:2015cv00324
Plaintiff:
Shonda Giddens-Thomas
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia , C. T. Woody, Jr. , William Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
