Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Eagle Cove Camp & Conference Center, Inc. et al v. Town Of Woodboro et al
as 3:2010cv00118
Plaintiff:
Eagle Cove Camp & Conference Center, Inc. , Arthur G. Jaros, Jr. , Wesley A. Jaros and others
Defendant:
Town of Woodboro, Wisconsin, County of Oneida, Wisconsin and Oneida County Board of Adjustment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 cc RLUIPA (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)
Zavalidroga v. Cote
as 10-492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Margaret Zavalidroga and Tomas Zavalidroga
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph S. Cote, Individually, John Doe, Doris M. Kelley and others
Tuff v. Oneida County et al
as 6:2009cv00959
Plaintiff:
Leroy Tuff, Jr.
Defendant:
Oneida County, Grant Gilmone, Barry Donaldty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tuff v. Oneida County et al
as 6:2009cv00328
Plaintiff:
Leroy Tuff, Jr.
Defendant:
Oneida County, Barry Donalty and Grant Garramone
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tuff v. Oneida County Jail, et al
as 6:2009cv00185
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Tuff
Defendant:
Oneida County Jail and Liddy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tuff v. Oneida County District Attorneys Office
as 6:2009cv00184
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Tuff
Defendant:
Oneida County District Attorneys Office
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tuff v. Oneida County Jail, et al
as 9:2009cv00185
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Tuff
Defendant:
Oneida County and Liddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Oneida County (CPS) et al
as 6:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jaelen M.R. Wright
Defendant:
Oneida County (CPS) and Laurie Surlow Coleman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Turner v. Oneida County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2008cv01212
Plaintiff:
Reynold Turner and Reynold Turner
Defendant:
Oneida County Sheriff's Department, The County of Oneida, New York, Central New York Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
