Cases 61 - 70 of 76
WHITE v. NOVAK et al
as 1:2012cv00133
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and ADAM C. NOVAK
Plaintiff:
DANNY WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MOSS v. WHITE et al
as 1:2011cv01470
Defendant:
JOHN R. LAYTON and ELIZABETH L. WHITE
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODARD v. HOGSETT et al
as 1:2011cv01301
Defendant:
PAT CASANOVA, MOLLY CHAMBERLIN, LISA CLIFFORD and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL WOODARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KERZAN v. TERKOSKY et al
as 1:2011cv00715
Defendant:
GREENE-SULLIVAN SPECIAL EDUCATION COOPERATIVE, PATRICIA TERKOSKY and WHITE RIVER VALLEY SCHOOL CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
SUMMER KERZAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. Amones et al
as 2:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Karen Flores
Defendant:
Reid Amones , Joellen Raby , Johnny Goodlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MENENDEZ v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2011cv00361
Defendant:
JOHN BUSSING, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS/STATE OF INDIANA:, ANGELA D. COE and others
Plaintiff:
RACHEL MARIE MENENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. MASCHINO et al
as 4:2011cv00019
Defendant:
JENNINGS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and OFFICER NICHOLAS MASCHINO
Plaintiff:
EMMA L. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Steuben County et al
as 1:2011cv00019
Plaintiff:
James L White
Defendant:
Steuben County , Richard L Lewis , Douglas Grandin and others
Mediator:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ILES v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2010cv01377
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. ILES
Defendant:
R. SCOTT WADDELL and JESSE WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Srivastava PHD v. Daniels et al
as 2:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
Carolyn H Srivastava PHD
Defendant:
Mitchell Daniels, Randall Shepard, Gregory Zoeller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
