Cases 71 - 80 of 102
Goins v. City of Sansom Park et al
as 4:2014cv00365
Plaintiff:
Aron Benjamin Goins
Defendant:
City of Sansom Park , Matthew Hudman , Douglas Hudman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. City of Fort Worth et al
as 3:2014cv01698
Plaintiff:
Nelda Davis
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth , Dacian Halmagean , Amy Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. City of Fort Worth et al
as 4:2014cv00491
Plaintiff:
Nelda Davis
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth , Dacian Halmagean and Amy Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dillard v. Local Social Security Office et al
as 4:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Dillard
Defendant:
Local Social Security Office, Amy Green, Bill Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dillard v. Local Social Security Office et al
as 3:2014cv00480
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Dillard
Defendant:
Local Social Security Office, Amy Green, Bill Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ware v. Texas DFPS et al
as 4:2013cv02700
Plaintiff:
Aimee Ware
Defendant:
Texas DFPS, Audrey Deckingha, Anne Heilgelstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. College of the Mainland et al
as 3:2013cv00307
Plaintiff:
David Michael Smith
Defendant:
College of the Mainland, Board of Trustees for College of the Mainland, Dr. Beth Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Rubell v. Medco et al
as 7:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
Donnie G Rubell
Defendant:
Medco, Amy Chastain, United States Fire Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Greer v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
as 2:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Amy Greer
Defendant:
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Paselk v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2012cv00754
Plaintiff:
Carol Paselk
Defendant:
State of Texas, Hopkins County Texas, Hopkins County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
