Cases 71 - 80 of 250
MARTINEZ v. TAX CLAIM BUREAU DIRECTOR STACY PHILE et al
as 5:2019cv04087
Plaintiff:
GILBERT MARTINEZ and GILBERT M. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY ASSESSMENT OFFICE, TREASURER DENNIS ADAMS, BERKS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WAGNER v. BRENTWOOD BOROUGH et al
as 2:2019cv00971
Defendant:
CHIEF ADAM R. ZEPPUHAR and BRENTWOOD BOROUGH
Plaintiff:
FARRELL WAGNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANDERSON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv00612
Defendant:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ORLANDO HARPER, MICHAEL GILLESPIE and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORKOWSKI v. MCCAULEY et al
as 2:2019cv02087
Defendant:
ROBERT A. LEIPZIGER, BRISTOL TOWNSHIP SEWER DEPARTMENT, RANDALL C. FLAGER and others
Plaintiff:
LUDWIG ORKOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. CITY OF BUTLER et al
as 1:2019cv00134
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, CITY OF BUTLER, OFFICER BRIAN GROOM and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellberger et al v. Guichardan et al
as 3:2019cv00726
Defendant:
Teresa D Miller, William J O'Gurek, Susan Byrnes and others
Plaintiff:
Melody Ellberger and Daniel Leeper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLY v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2019cv00561
Defendant:
JIM RUGO, SANDRA FOEHL, VLADIMIRA WILENT and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHON MICHAEL OMAR ALLY and JONATHAN MICHAEL OMAR ALLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Schauers et al
as 1:2019cv00171
Defendant:
Barbara Nixon, Lewis Reagan, Thomas H Kelly, VI and others
Plaintiff:
William Henry Hawkins, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEE v. BROWN et al
as 2:2018cv01630
Defendant:
DALE BROWN, ADAM SIKORSKI, JAMES PIERCE and others
Plaintiff:
DAYLAN MCLEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. HULMES et al
as 2:2018cv05181
Plaintiff:
QUENTIN ADAMS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CHRISTOPHER HULMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
