Other Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 78 of 78
Bradley v. Tibbles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00366
Plaintiff: Brudnell Bradley
Defendant: K Tibbles, Indiana Department of Correction and Unknown Indiana Department Of Correction
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BAUGH v. PARKS et al
as 1:2008cv00833
Plaintiff: MATTHEW A. BAUGH
Defendant: KARLENE PARKS, JOHN DOE, SHERRY MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TURNER v. LAMAR et al
as 1:2008cv00063
Plaintiff: CLAYTON TURNER and CLAYTON TURNER
Defendant: OFFICER __________ LAMAR and STATE OF INDIANA/INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION (PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEACH v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2007cv01376
Plaintiff: GABRIEL LEACH
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, THE GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
PATTERSON et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2007cv01318
Plaintiff: WILLIAM PATTERSON and R. P.
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RESIG v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2007cv00688
Plaintiff: JAN RESIG
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
SPURLOCK v. THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2007cv00332
Plaintiff: JARMAN SPURLOCK
Defendant: THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and CHRIS MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kinslow v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00005
Plaintiff: Terry Lee Kinslow
Defendant: Indiana Department of Corrections, Larry Warg, Linda Depauw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?