Cases 81 - 90 of 7,221
Caraballo v. Forgey et al
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Frank Caraballo
Defendant:
William Forgey, M.D., Correctional Health Indiana, Inc., William Forgey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jackson v. Wabash County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Chad Jackson
Defendant:
Wabash County Sheriff, Brooke Murphy, Ms. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
RICE v. CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RICE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, K. DANIELS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOMEZ v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
LUIS GOMEZ
Defendant:
L MARSHALL ID # 44402 and L. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bundy v. Bojovic
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Bundy
Defendant:
Tamara Bojovic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bundy v. Bojovic
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Bundy
Defendant:
Tamara Bojovic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AYERS v. CALLAHAN et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
JARON AYERS
Defendant:
BLAKE CALLAHAN and TOWN OF CHESTERFIELD, IN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RHODES et al v. JEFFERSONVILLE BUILDING COMMISSIONER et al
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
GLENN S. RHODES and SHARON YOUNG
Defendant:
JEFFERSON BUILDING COMMISSION, JEFFERSON ENGINEERS OFFICE, MUNICIPALITY AND PUBLIC UTILITIES OF JEFFERSONVILLE INDIANA and others
Taebel v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Eric Holcomb and Rokita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Upshaw v. Custer et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Radiance Marie Upshaw
Defendant:
Jason Custer, John Bohdan and Lawrence Shine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
