Cases 81 - 90 of 258
Raymond Baldwin, et al v. Barbie Doe, et al
as 17-35382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND BALDWIN, Private Attorney General, PAG; Class, CRYSTAL BALDWIN and PEOPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF OREGON
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBIE DOE, (Last name unknown), Clackamas County Deputy Clerk, JANICE DOE, (Last name unknown), Clackamas County Deputy Clerk, JOHN DOE, All remaining Deputy Clerks, agents of, of Clackamas County Clerk's office of and in the State of Oregon (individual and official capacities), And ALL remaining Counties of and in the State of Oregon, ALL County Clerks their Deputy Clerks and ag and others
Carol Carter, et al v. Kevin Washburn, et al
as 17-15839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL COGHLAN CARTER, next friend of A.D., C.C., L..G. and C.R., minors next friend of A.D. next friend of C.C. next friend of L.G. next friend of C.R., UNKNOWN PARTY, named as S.H., a married couple, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as J.H., a married couple and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN K. WASHBURN, Esquire, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Bureau of Indian Affairs, SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, United States Department of the Interior and GREGORY MCKAY, named as Gregory A. McKay, in his official capacity as Director of Arizona Department of Child Safety
Estate Of Earnest Lee Boyland, et al v. AGRI, et al
as 17-5082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Estate of Earnest Lee Boyland, Estate of David Shelton, Estate of Lee Sylvester Caldwell and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Agriculture, EPIQ Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc., United States Department of Agriculture Hispanic & Women Farmers And Ranchers Claims Administrator and others
Milburn v. Dogin
as 17-1062
Plaintiff:
Louis Milburn and A. Brown, for Class of Louis Milburn
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samuel Irvin
Defendant - Appellee:
Henry S. Dogin, Administrator Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, United States Department of Justice, David R. Harris, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional Facility, Thomas A. Coughlin, III and others
Angela McCullough, et al v. City of Montgomery, Alabama, et al
as 17-11554
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANGELA MCCULLOUGH, MARQUITA JOHNSON, KENNY JONES and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, ERNEST FINLEY, KEVIN MURPHY, former Chief of Police of the City of Montgomery, in his individual and official capacities and others
Planned Parenthood of Grt TX, et al v. Charles Smith, et al
as 17-50282
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING AND PREVENTATIVE HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED, PLANNED PARENTHOOD SAN ANTONIO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CAMERON COUNTY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STUART W. BOWEN, JR., Inspector General of HHSC, in his official capacity and CHARLES SMITH, Executive Commissioner of HHSC
Ohlson v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2017cv00796
Plaintiff:
Keith Ohlson
Defendant:
State of Colorado, County of Arapahoe, City of Centennial and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 241
Benjamin Schwarz v. Erwin Meinberg, et al
as 17-55298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN R. SCHWARZ, in his individual and class representative capacities
Defendant - Appellee:
ERWIN MEINBERG, BRENDA BURCH, ROBERT E MCFADDEN and others
Michael Beley, et al v. City of Chicago
as 17-1449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BELEY and DOUGLAS MONTGOMERY, individually and on behalf of a class
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO
TN, et al v. Bill Gibbons, et al
as 17-5187
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, on relationship, of and
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS PATTERSON, in his individual capacity and as Relator for the State of Tennessee and as Representative for Class Members
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL GIBBONS, JOHN AND JANE DOES, as a Class of Tennessee officers, directors, managers and employees whose conduct is covered by Tennessee's blanket security bond,, FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, as surety for Defendants Gibbons, Martin, and Tennessee John and Jane Does and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
