Cases 81 - 90 of 18,497
LABONTE v. HENRY et al
as 2:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant:
MICHELLE A. HENRY and CHRISTOPHER L. PARIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LILLIOCK v. WALTZ et al
as 2:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
KEITH LILLIOCK
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WALTZ, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: SMITH
as 2:2024cv01787
Plaintiff:
JERRY SMITH, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GBOHUNMI et al v. MOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE
as 2:2024cv01677
Plaintiff:
ALAKE GBOHUNMI and STEPHANIE KEENE
Defendant:
MOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Greenfield v. The City of Scranton
as 3:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Larry Greenfield
Defendant:
The City of Scranton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
La Ronde-Bey v. Chica et al
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Noble Lester Keith La Ronde-Bey
Defendant:
Michael Chica, Rich P. White, Tyler Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHESTNUT v. ACP/467 et al
as 2:2024cv01674
Plaintiff:
TARA CHESTNUT
Defendant:
ACP/467, CHIDIALDI EZENGWU, CHANELL PRATER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. STRUBINGER et al
as 2:2024cv01655
Plaintiff:
ALISHA SMITH
Defendant:
SERGEANT GEOFFREY STRUBINGER, DETECTIVE THOMAS D'ALESIO and NORMA PELUYERA-ALAMO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THEN v. HOOVER et al
as 2:2024cv01651
Plaintiff:
CARLOS THEN
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JASON HOOVER, POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW WALSH, POLICE OFFICER JOEY BIANCHIMANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Katona v. Apgar et al
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Matthew Katona
Defendant:
Joseph Apgar, Ashley Rzesewski, Shane Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
