Cases 1 - 10 of 7,226
Taebel v. YouTube
as 2:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
YouTube
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Taebel v Instagram
as 2:2024cv00226
Defendant:
Mitch Taebel and Instagram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Branch v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Carrington Branch
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF, DEPUTY ONE, DEPUTY TWO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
Howard v. Access Transcripts LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Dennis Howard
Defendant:
Access Transcripts LLC and Abbey Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'CONNOR HILL
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
IRMA J O'CONNOR HILL
Defendant:
Brandon Meyer, Randall Canady, Mike McNealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Honn v. Indiana Department of Child Services
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Rebecca A Honn
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Child Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moore v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Moore
Defendant:
Ron Neal and Debra Taylor
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKLAND, INC. v. CITY OF SEYMOUR et al
as 1:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
PARKLAND, INC. d/b/a THE VILLAGE GREEN HOMES
Defendant:
CITY OF SEYMOUR, SEYMOUR MUNICIPAL SANITATION UTILITY, CLERK TREASURER DARRIN BOAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
SPARKS v. SILVA et al
as 1:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. SPARKS
Defendant:
NATHAN SILVA, STERLING THOMPSON and TOWN OF PENDLETON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINGH v. COUNTY OF HENDRICKS, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
KEVIN C. SINGH
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HENDRICKS, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
