Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Williams v. Constant et al
as 3:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Nial Sherwood Williams
Defendant:
Christopher Constant, Thomas Bruce, Michael C. Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M. et al v. Crum et al
as 3:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah M., Hannah M., Hunter M. and others
Defendant:
Adam Crum, Kim Guay, Alaska Deparment of Health and Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fanene v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Masae Fanene
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Jane Doe, Municipality of Anchorage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hiatt v. Webb
as 3:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Scena B. Webb
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Hiatt, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. State of Alaska
as 4:2018cv00036
Defendant:
State of Alaska
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 3:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Skidmore et al
as 3:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
Keane-Alexander Crawford
Defendant:
John B. Skidmore , Officers of the Anchorage Police Department , Megan Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simmons v. Wallace et al
as 3:2010cv00280
Plaintiff:
David Simmons
Defendant:
Stephen B. Wallace, Mark I. Wood, Joseph E. Wrona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nason v. Miller et al
as 3:2009cv00161
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Nason
Defendant:
Debbie Miller, S. Carter and B. B. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shorthill et al v. Conley et al
as 3:2007cv00193
Plaintiff:
Carry Eugene Shorthill and Tina Rae
Defendant:
James M. Conley, Christopher Roger Nelson, Richard Dykstra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
