Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Robinson v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2024cv01330
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Human Services Campus Incorporated
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
Human Services Campus Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robinson v. Robinson et al
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert W Robinson
Defendant:
Carol A Robinson and Tami P Sexton
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 3005 Detention of Mail for Temporary Periods
Robinson v. Human Services Campus Incorporated
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
Human Services Campus Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. BMO Harris Bank NA
as 2:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
BMO Harris Bank NA and BMO Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolford v. Kendall et al
as 2:2023cv02168
Plaintiff:
Allen Kirk Wolford
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, III and Brian Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glass v. Robinson et al
as 2:2019cv04883
Plaintiff:
Samantha Glass
Defendant:
Christopher Robinson and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Queen Elizabeth et al
as 2:2018cv00880
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Stokes
Defendant:
Queen Elizabeth, II, Prince Charles, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Gilbert, Town of et al
as 2:2017cv02155
Plaintiff:
Scott Harvey Hernandez
Defendant:
Gilbert, Town of , Chris Robinson , Unknown Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Denby et al v. Casa Grande, City of et al
as 2:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
James W Denby , Elizabeth J Torres and Wilma J Logston
Defendant:
Casa Grande, City of , Pinal, County of , Francisco X Lujan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
