Other Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 130
SPEECH FIRST, INC v. WHITTEN et al
as 1:2024cv00898
Plaintiff: SPEECH FIRST, INC
Defendant: PAMELA WHITTEN, LAMAR HYLTON, KATHY ADAMS RIESTER and others
REAMER v. MITCHELL
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff: ADAM REAMER
Defendant: BRADEN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benyoun v. East Chicago IN City of et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff: Mr. Marcus C. Benyoun and Marcus C Benyoun
Defendant: City of East Chicago, IN, Louis Gonzalez, Adam Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Garrett City of et al
as 1:2023cv00529
Plaintiff: DALE K.R. MILLER and Dale K R Miller
Defendant: CITY OF GARRETT, CHIEF OF POLICE GERALD KLINE, OFFICER ADAM E. SHEFFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
WARREN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02047
Defendant: GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, GREG HOLCUMB, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff: JOCELYN WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barr et al v. St. John, The Town of et al
as 2:2023cv00335
Plaintiff: Robert Barr and Laura Barr
Defendant: Town of St. John, Indiana, Town of St. John, Police Department, Steven Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swick v. Google
as 3:2023cv00543
Plaintiff: Adam R Swick
Defendant: Google
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swick v. Comcast Business We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00531
Plaintiff: Adam R Swick
Defendant: Comcast Business
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swick v. State Farm
as 3:2023cv00542
Plaintiff: Adam R Swick
Defendant: State Farm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swick v. Apple
as 3:2023cv00539
Plaintiff: Adam R Swick
Defendant: Apple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?