Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BOWEN v. ISON et al
as 1:2023cv01118
Plaintiff:
SAM BOWEN and CITY OF GREENWOOD, INDIANA
Defendant:
JAMES ISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowens v Sunshine Retirement Living, LLC
as 3:2020cv00379
Plaintiff:
AMBER BOWENS
Defendant:
SUNSHINE RETIREMENT LIVING, LLC and Sunshine Retirement Living, LLC doing business as Heritage Point Assisted Living and Memory Care
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
RIDDLE et al v. RYAN et al
as 1:2019cv01263
Plaintiff:
DAWN RIDDLE and MATT RIDDLE
Defendant:
SYED J KHAN, NICOLE M RYAN, RETA K BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. Bowen et al
as 3:2019cv00007
Defendant:
Tami Napier, Robert O Bowen and Nelson E Chipman, Jr
Plaintiff:
Connie Sue Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HECK v. BOWEN et al
as 1:2018cv02939
Plaintiff:
SARA HECK and SARA MARIE HECK
Defendant:
COMMANDER JASON SLODERBECK, SHERIFF MARK BOWEN, MARK BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COZATT v. STEIN et al
as 1:2018cv02456
Defendant:
ALLEN REID, ANGELA SWENSON, CODY COGSWELL and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY COZATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. The Otis R. Bowen Center for Human Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Pedro Perez
Defendant:
Officer J. James, Officer C. Harruff, The Otis R. Bowen Center for Human Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holl v. Otis R Bowen Center for Human Services Inc
as 3:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anthony Holl
Defendant:
Otis R Bowen Center for Human Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWERS v. HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv00285
Defendant:
CHRISTINE ALTMAN, MARK J. BOWEN, STEVEN C. DILLINGER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOWERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOWENS v. INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BOWENS
Defendant:
K. BROWN, W. BURTON, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
