Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Chapman v. Mott's LLP
as 1:2023cv01498
Plaintiff:
Crystal S. Chapman
Defendant:
Mott's LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
VAZQUEZ v. CHAPMAN
as 2:2022cv00867
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL JOEY VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
LEIGH M. CHAPMAN and PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ZAHIR v. HOGAN et al
as 2:2020cv06051
Defendant:
LAWRENCE JOSEPH HOGAN, JR., RALPH NORTHAM, THOMAS A MOOREHEAD and others
Plaintiff:
NAJA TALIBAH ZAHIR
Trustee:
QUEEN NAJA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. DSC Logistics, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02122
Plaintiff:
Crystal Chapman
Defendant:
DSC Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES et al v. STATE OF DELAWARE et al
as 2:2015cv06418
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. HOLMES and JULIE E. MCCREY-HOLMES
Defendant:
STATE OF DELAWARE, DEPARTMENT OF SERVICES FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND THEIR FAMILIES (DSCYF), CHILDRENS CHOICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUCKETT v. MILLER et al
as 2:2015cv01019
Plaintiff:
JULIANN PUCKETT
Defendant:
BRIAN MILLER, MICHAEL ZAVADA, BARRY CROFTCHECK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GINDRAW v. CHAPMAN FORD, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02229
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GINDRAW
Defendant:
CHAPMAN FORD, INC. , KEN NIXON and TIMOTHY SCHNEIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CHAPMAN v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv03386
Plaintiff:
JAMIL CHAPMAN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EHNERT v. CHAPMAN CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv00529
Plaintiff:
HANS C. EHNERT
Defendant:
CHAPMAN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Chapman v. Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00192
Plaintiff:
Shonda Chapman
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association, Inc. , James T. Zack , Francis M. Majikes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
