Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Hamilton v. DeJoy
as 1:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
Chelsea A. Hamilton
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edmond et al v. Brap LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01250
Plaintiff:
Lakeshia Edmond, Rev. James Murry, Brad F. Jones and others
Defendant:
Brap, LLC, Chelsea Gallegos, Derrick Edmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Long et al
as 5:2021cv00479
Defendant:
Corporal James Plummer, Rita Kruger, Jacob Wayne Bellington and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jon Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Wood County, Texas et al
as 6:2020cv00271
Plaintiff:
Dustin Reynolds
Defendant:
Chelsea Fuller, Wood County, Texas, Angela Speakman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connor v. Warfab Oilfield Services
as 2:2017cv00683
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Connor
Defendant:
Warfab Oilfield Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
INVESTMENT BUILDERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. et al v. Cichon et al
as 3:2016cv00497
Defendant:
AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACQUISITIONS, INC, AHV ARROWHEAD PLACE, INC., AHV DESERT VILLAS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ARROWHEAD PLACE, LTD., CACTUS ROSE, LTD., DESERT BREEZE, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Davis
as 4:2015cv00414
Defendant:
Chelsea L Davis
Thirdparty_defendant:
State of Texas
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Chelsea L Davis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Southern Methodist University et al
as 3:2015cv00531
Plaintiff:
Chelsea L Davis
Defendant:
Southern Methodist University, Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, David C Godbey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Crow
as 3:2015cv00493
Plaintiff:
Chelsea L Davis
Defendant:
Harlan R Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
