Cases 1 - 10 of 10
v. Davis
as 4:2015cv00414
Defendant:
Chelsea L Davis
Thirdparty_defendant:
State of Texas
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Chelsea L Davis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Davis v. Southern Methodist University et al
as 3:2015cv00531
Plaintiff:
Chelsea L Davis
Defendant:
Southern Methodist University, Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, David C Godbey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Southern Methodist University et al
as 3:2015cv00488
Plaintiff:
Chelsea L Davis
Defendant:
Southern Methodist University, Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, John Attanasio and others
Movant:
Harlan R Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Davis v. Crow
as 3:2015cv00493
Plaintiff:
Chelsea L Davis
Defendant:
Harlan R Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. State Bar of Texas et al
as 3:2014cv04215
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Chelsea L Davis
Intervenor_defendant:
State Bar of Texas and McKool Smith P.C.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014xc03963
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Ackman et al
as 3:2013cv04973
Plaintiff:
Chelsea L Davis
Defendant:
William A Ackman, J Kyle Bass, Clint D Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. McKool Smith PC et al
as 3:2013cv04926
Plaintiff:
Chelsea L. Davis
Defendant:
McKool Smith PC and BOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
