Cases 1 - 10 of 22
MARSHALL v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
DYLAN MARSHALL
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAM SEDORIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AKOUALA v. AMAZON et al
as 4:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN AKOUALA
Defendant:
AMAZON, FEDEX GROUND/ OFFICE and USCIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Wilder v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wilder
Defendant:
Christian K Mitchell, Sherri Lynn Kinzie, Danielle Nicole Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Hupfer et al
as 1:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Kyle Hupfer, Chuck Williams, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitre v. Bechtold
as 1:2021cv00228
Plaintiff:
Matthew Christian Pitre
Defendant:
Jacob Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitre v. Bechtold
as 1:2021cv00220
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pitre and Matthew Christian Pitre
Defendant:
Jacob Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitre v. Whitley Superior Court
as 1:2021cv00218
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pitre and Matthew Christian Pitre
Defendant:
Whitley Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAND v. HENDRICKS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00727
Defendant:
MEGAN MORGAN, HENDRICKS COUNTY JAIL, HENDRICKS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BRAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan v. Pegan et al
as 1:2019cv00208
Defendant:
Samantha Hammond, Kevin Pegan, Jessica Mae Wallen and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Hogan
Not Yet Classified:
Carolyn Trier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, et al
as 1:2019cv01241
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN L KEEN and CHRISTIAN L. KEEN
Defendant:
MALACHI WEST, DOUGLAS SWAILS, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, acting by and through its Metropolitan Police Department; and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
