Cases 1 - 10 of 10
STANFIELD v. EPD, INTERNAL AFFAIRS et al
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
LYRIC STANFIELD
Defendant:
EPD, INTERNAL AFFAIRS, TODD LINCOLN, KEVIN DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LATOUCHE v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2018cv00192
Plaintiff:
LINDA LATOUCHE
Defendant:
PETER DEYOUNG, CITY OF EVANSVILLE, JOHN PIESZCHALSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANTEY v. DONAHUE et al
as 3:2012cv00085
Plaintiff:
ROBIN ANTEY
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA and OFFICER KEVIN M. DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEELE v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2010cv00556
Defendant:
KEITH CLANTON, J. DAVID DONAHUE, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
SHAUN STEELE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PARKS v. BUSS et al
as 1:2009cv01174
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY PARKS
Defendant:
EDWIN BUSS, J. DAVID DONAHUE, JIM WYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Absher v. Donahue et al
as 3:2009cv00113
Plaintiff:
James Absher
Defendant:
J David Donahue, Ed Buss, Larry Shadley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MITCHELL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2008cv01465
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. MITCHELL
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, INDIANA STATE PRISON, J. DAVID DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCPHERSON et al v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2007cv01452
Plaintiff:
MARK MCPHERSON, MARK MCPHERSON, KEVIN HUMMEL and others
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE and WALTER E. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIS v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2007cv01295
Plaintiff:
MASTON WILLIS and MASTON WILLIS
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE and WALTER E. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONNER v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01195
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN CONNER
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., J. DAVID DONAHUE, GILBERT PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
