Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ROBINSON v. Hutchinson et al
as 5:2023cv04774
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBINSON
Defendant:
Kevin Hutchinson individually and doing business as UBREAKIFIX BY ASURION, OFFICER RYAN M. WIEGAND and East Lampeter Township Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CLARK v. HARCHA, III et al
as 2:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
DEJON LAMAR CHRISTOPHER CLARK
Defendant:
HOWARD H. HARCHA, III, ANTONY BLINKEN, ANDREW SAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
FOSTER v. SLOMSKY et al
as 2:2022cv03349
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D. FOSTER
Defendant:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, CLERKS TO BE NAMED, LANDON Y. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAMPBELL et al v. PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2018cv00892
Plaintiff:
SIMON CAMPBELL and PENNSYLVANIANS FOR UNION REFORM
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION , MICHAEL FACCINETTO , DAVID HUTCHINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUTLER v. GREEN et al
as 2:2017cv00984
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY CUTLER
Defendant:
AMBER GREEN , RALPH HUTCHINSON , SELECTED PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC OFFICIALS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINSON v. SPAEDER et al
as 2:2016cv02322
Plaintiff:
SCHEIE HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
LEO SPAEDER , WILLIAMS , DILORENZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAWLEY et al v. WEST CALN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2013cv04791
Plaintiff:
RANDY HAWLEY , BARBARA HAWLEY and ZACHARY HAWLEY
Defendant:
WEST CALN TOWNSHIP and IAN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINSON v. WENNER
as 1:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
MARK A. HUTCHINSON, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT WENNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HUTCHINSON v. HART et al
as 2:2009cv01624
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
DEWAYNE C. HART, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
