Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SWANIGAN et al v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, doing business as, IU HEALTH SAXONY HOSPITAL
as 1:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
RENITA SWANIGAN, SHARON DUNKLEY, BETTY ELMORE and others
Defendant:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, doing business as, IU HEALTH SAXONY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr - Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
MABES et al v. MCFEELEY et al
as 1:2021cv02062
Plaintiff:
ERIKA MABES and BRIAN MABES
Defendant:
ANGELA MCFEELEY, NATASHA DAVIS, COURTNEY OAKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILES v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2021cv01134
Defendant:
IU TRANSPLANT UNIT, IU HOSPITAL, TONI BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR D. MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PENDLETON et al v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2020cv00489
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PENDLETON and ANTOINE BANKS
Defendant:
MICHAEL MURPHY, SGT WHITE, ROBERT DYCUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH et al
as 1:2019cv03397
Plaintiff:
LIONEL DAVID FOWLER
Defendant:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH and METHODIST HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOWLER v. METHODIST HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2019cv03404
Plaintiff:
LIONEL DAVID FOWLER
Defendant:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH and METHODIST HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Royal v. Indiana University Health et al
as 1:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Vanya D Royal
Defendant:
Indiana University Health, Norman Minor, Shari Kisser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEY v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH et al
as 1:2014cv01007
Defendant:
IAN BISSONNETTE, BLOOMINGTON HOSPITAL, G. THOMAS GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
EARL R. KEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BABCHUK et al v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01376
Defendant:
DIANNA ANDREWS, KEVIN W. CONDICT, MICHAEL L. HARLOWE and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM I. BABCHUK, M.D. and WILLIAM I. BABCHUK, M.D., P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
