Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HOUGH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03508
Plaintiff:
CALLUM WILSON, MAHEEN SHAFI, CHRISTOPHER ROMANO and others
Defendant:
DENNIS WILSON, JANE/JOHN DOES 1-100, RICHARD NICOLETTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BURNS et al v. FEMIANI et al
as 1:2018cv00391
Defendant:
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP, ENCOMPASS INSURANCE, THE PA STATE POLICE, STATE OF PA and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. BURNS and KAREN K. BURNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. KEEFE GROUP
as 2:2018cv05111
Defendant:
KEEFE GROUP
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUBIN v. SOLEBURY TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2018cv02103
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HARRISON RUBIN
Defendant:
SOLEBURY TOWNSHIP, MICHAEL RODGERS, SOLEBURY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL et al v. PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2018cv00892
Plaintiff:
SIMON CAMPBELL and PENNSYLVANIANS FOR UNION REFORM
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION , MICHAEL FACCINETTO , DAVID HUTCHINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. KEEFE GROUP
as 2:2016cv05543
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
KEEFE GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fetters et al v. Mearkle et al
as 1:2015cv01935
Plaintiff:
Diane Fetters , Daniel Kassick and Dale Kassick
Defendant:
Lisa Mearkle, Charles Dowell , Bradley Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cerski v. The Borough of Ashley et al
as 3:2012cv02505
Plaintiff:
David Cerski
Defendant:
The Borough of Ashley, James Mullin, Martin McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TRAVILLION v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2007cv00928
Plaintiff:
JAMAR L. TRAVILLION
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, DAN ONORATO, RAMON R. RUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
