Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Storck v. Law Enforcement et al
as 5:2024cv11384
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Storck
Defendant:
Law Enforcement, Detroit Edison Energy Company, Attorneys, Lawyers and Hospitals and others
Serrant v. Perlman et al
as 4:2024cv11353
Plaintiff:
Crystal Serrant
Defendant:
Jeffrey Perlman, Law Offices of Jeffrey Perlman, Akiva E. Goldman and others
Strege v. Nuclear Missile Rosatom et al
as 2:2024cv11156
Plaintiff:
Adam Strege
Defendant:
Nuclear Missile Rosatom, Social Security, 10 Unknown Named Grand Rapids Michigan Social Security Admirative Law Judges Office Worker and others
Wilson v. Bynum et al
as 1:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
Amy Wilson
Defendant:
Tyrone Bynum and Law Offices of Tyrone Bynum, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Lockhart v. DeLuca et al
as 2:2023cv11873
Plaintiff:
Jameel Lockhart
Defendant:
Steven DeLuca, Wesley J. Neal, Leslie Kim Smith and others
Laws v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Addis Adam Laws, Jr.
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Division of Child Support Services, Kent, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Shaffer v. CMDA Law Firm
as 1:2022cv00905
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Shaffer
Defendant:
CMDA Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rice et al v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv11345
Plaintiff:
Keith Rice and Paris Motley Rice
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation, Robert J. Kinggo III, Trott Law, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rice et al v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2022cv10608
Plaintiff:
Keith Rice and Paris Motley-Rice
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Sung Hung, Trott Law, P.C. and others
Beard-Ford v. Southfield, City of et al
as 2:2020cv13229
Defendant:
Sue Ward, Southfield, City of, Southfield Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Johnette Beard-Ford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
