Cases 1 - 10 of 112
LEE v. DONG BANG CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv21824
Plaintiff:
SARAH LEE
Defendant:
DONG BANG CORPORATION, MI JA KIM, JU HI KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
RICHARDSON v. MCCORMICK et al
as 2:2023cv21729
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
TYLER MCCORMICK, LEE KAFCHINSKI and JEREMIAH LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
SMITH et al v. RICHTER et al
as 2:2023cv13456
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE SMITH and BARBARA SMITH
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER RICHTER and BOROUGH OF FORT LEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. FACEBOOK et al
as 3:2023cv12399
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, META, RUDY GIULIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEE v. GALLINA-MECCA et al
as 2:2023cv06495
Plaintiff:
BANDY LEE
Defendant:
JANE GALLINA-MECCA and EVELYN F. NISSIRIOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. VAN NESS et al
as 3:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
JOEL DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER VAN NESS, LEE BRODOWSKI, ROB ORR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ESTATE OF LEE THOMAS WASKIEWICZ et al v. CITY OF BAYONNE et al
as 2:2023cv03095
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LEE THOMAS WASKIEWICZ and JEAN WASKIEWICZ
Defendant:
CITY OF BAYONNE, TIMOTHY BALLANCE JR., EDWARD TAVARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LASK v. JONES et al
as 3:2023cv02987
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LASK
Defendant:
JOHANNA BARBA JONES, TIMOTHY J MCNAMARA, STUART J. RABNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FINNEMEN v. LEE et al
as 1:2023cv02962
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMEN
Defendant:
LEE and CHRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OUAZIZ v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2023cv02696
Plaintiff:
BOUAZZA OUAZIZ
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, SARAH ADILMAN, FRANK MEZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
