Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Shaw v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02309
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Deshuna Shaw
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Memphis Police Internal Affairs Bureau, Tennessee Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. State Farm et al
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Hill
Defendant:
State Farm, TDCI, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Claxton v. Low-T Centers, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Crystal Claxton
Defendant:
Low-T Centers, Inc., Low-T Physicians Service, PLLC, Optimal Health, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
McLemore et al v. Gumucio et al
as 3:2019cv00530
Defendant:
John Thorpe, Ronald Coyler, Glenn Kopchak and others
Plaintiff:
Purple Wave, Inc., Interstate Auction Association, Aaron McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Laporte et al v. City of Nashville et al
as 3:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jude Laporte and Jomar Laporte
Defendant:
City of Nashville, Metropolitan Nashville Police Department, Tina Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dotson v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee
as 2:2017cv02210
Plaintiff:
Johnny Dotson
Defendant:
Nike Retail Services, Inc., City of Memphis, Tennessee, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lowe v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2016cv00083
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee , Danny Ferrell and Michael Jarvis
Plaintiff:
Cindy Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lowe v. McMinn County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
David Lowe
Defendant:
Bobby Jones , McMinn County and Town of Englewood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Farris et al
as 1:2015cv01027
Plaintiff:
V. Calvin Howell
Defendant:
Jimmy Farris, Sheila Dellinger, City of Bolivar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
