Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Burton et al v. Ward et al
as 1:2023cv05836
Plaintiff:
Cedric Burton, Jasman Maxwell and Amber Griffin
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Victor Walker, Raymond Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PRICE v. MILLER COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv00216
Defendant:
Nicholas Price, MILLER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Kreg Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS RICHARD PRICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTER v. MAXWELL
as 1:2020cv00202
Defendant:
SETH MAXWELL
Plaintiff:
ROMERO PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEOD v. INGRAM et al
as 7:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
BILLY INGRAM , BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA , MYRA EXAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbons v. McBride et al
as 1:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gibbons
Defendant:
William McBride, Ernest Black, Jr., Eugene Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Correct Care Solutions, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
Bridget Maxwell
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, L.L.C., Arlene Dennis, David Didier and others
Olawunmi et al v. DeKalb County, Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv01664
Plaintiff:
Olufemi Olawunmi , Michael Olawunmi and Michelle Olawumni
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Georgia, Michael L. Woodard and Larry A. Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooksey v. Waters et al
as 1:2009cv01469
Plaintiff:
Johnny C. Cooksey
Defendant:
W. Michael Waters, Allan Maxwell, Lora Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to interfere with civil rights
Cooksey v. Waters et al
as 1:2009mi00195
Plaintiff:
Johnny C. Cooksey
Defendant:
W. Michael Waters, Allan Maxwell, Lora Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to interfere with civil rights
Messina v. Cobb County, Georgia et al
as 1:2008cv03120
Plaintiff:
Patricia Messina
Defendant:
Cobb County, Georgia, Neil Warren, Douglas Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
