Other Civil Rights Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Shaw v. Dental Practice of Cordova et al
as 2:2024cv02268
Plaintiff: Tekeva Shaw
Defendant: Dental Practice of Cordova, Mid-South Oral Surgery, Christ Community Broad Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bansal v. Rainbow Enterprise, PLC et al
as 3:2019cv01001
Plaintiff: Dr. Vidya Bansal
Defendant: Rainbow Enterprise, PLC and Dr. Satish Prabhu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hastings v. State of Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02687
Plaintiff: Nedra Hastings
Defendant: Shelby County Government, Jimmy Moore, Van Sturdivant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Humphreys et al
as 3:2017cv00961
Plaintiff: Owen Carl Bell
Defendant: Gene Humphreys and Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ibrahim v. Rose et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00490
Plaintiff: Shemeka Ibrahim
Defendant: W. Alan Rose, John Doe, Wendy Lynn Longmire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bowman v. Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd. et al
as 2:2014cv00003
Plaintiff: Tammy Bowman
Defendant: Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd. and Buffaloe & Associates, PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barr v. Howard et al
as 2:2013cv00335
Plaintiff: James Barr
Defendant: Doffie Howard, Buffaloe & Associates, PLC and Stellar Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ellis v. CACH, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00321
Plaintiff: Franklin Ellis
Defendant: CACH, LLC and Buffaloe & Associates, PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Athey v. CACH, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00300
Plaintiff: Sandra K Athey
Defendant: CACH, LLC and Buffaloe & Associates, PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Campbell v. CACH, LLC
as 2:2013cv00285
Plaintiff: Clayton Campbell
Defendant: CACH, LLC and Buffaloe & Associates, PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?